Your writing voice defines your blog
When you read anything, you go on a journey with the words that the author presents for you; you hear that author’s “voice”. It’s the same when a person reads one of your blog posts: that reader should hear your voice.
There is nothing more confusing than when a blogger writes a post pushing a product in a selling voice one day, and a post about his experiences with Google in a storytelling voice the next. Every post you write should reflect your voice. If you let the type of post you are writing dictate your voice, how will your readers know who you are?
Defining your writing voice takes time and effort; you can’t simply fall into it. You need to be able to write clearly because the real selling point of your blog is you. Whatever you are preaching or selling is secondary to the voice your readers hear. Here are a few examples of different types of voices out there:
The happy voice
Many writers use excessive friendliness as a tool to win readers over. One of my pet hates is impulsively cheery bloggers. They’re the people who thank every person who makes a comment, and use excessive exclamation marks in their copy. They say things like, “I love my readers, you guys are great,” at every opportunity.
This technique works though. You see it a lot on MyLot and certain blogs. Being agreeable is a technique used by many bloggers. Amazingly, their readers react and respond in the same cheery manner. It can be like watching an episode of The Brady Bunch, but it has been proven to work. The best nice-guy blogger I’m reading at the moment is Ben Cook. He does an excellent job with his writing voice and he has achieved great success already.
Although I usually don’t enjoy “happy bloggers”, I make Blogging Experiment one of my daily reads because it’s interesting to see how Ben writes and builds up his readership.
The aggressive voice
Some bloggers write aggressively. Everything is a hard sell and everything is written promoting the best software or the best technique to make money blogging. Aggressive bloggers will tell you they are the best and tell you that everybody else is insignificant.
While it isn’t the only way to make money, aggressive blogging can work because it’s a way to sell something. The problem comes when the blogger’s voice becomes little more than ad copy one day, while offering you great tips the next. How can you trust a blogger who writes so inconsistently? Aggressive bloggers write on the basis that people forget anything not on the front page. I disagree: several blogs have already killed their blogging voice by writing in and out of character from one day to the next.
The people’s voice
This where I put people like Darren Rowse. You always feel like Darren is on your side and that it’s genuine. He writes for his readers, never aggressively, but always with the authority that comes with being an expert in his field. This is a position that few bloggers will ever find themselves in.
Darren has almost 35,000 RSS subscribers because he is good at what he does and people like him. The difference between Darren’s style and that of a “happy blogger” is that Darren’s voice is effortless to read. You read it as if you are talking to your neighbor over the fence. That’s a difficult style to achieve.
The knowledgeable voice
I read Dosh Dosh several times a week because Maki never alters his style. He writes with authority in every post. When you visit Dosh Dosh, you know exactly what you are getting: straight up facts. To emulate this style to any degree of success requires knowledge.
Maki goes to great lengths to make his posts definitive resources for certain topics. There are no shortcuts with that type of blogging, and while it isn’t the most personal approach, if you know what you are talking about then your blog will become a reference for other people.
Let your voice flow
Your own blogging voice will come once you get comfortable with writing. It takes time to learn how to write well. Bad grammar and syntax is one way to distort your voice. Pay attention to what you’re writing, read it through at least once and use your spellchecker.






