<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t buy a John Chow review without the blog to back it up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:04:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sutocu</title>
		<link>http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Sutocu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>$200? Does ReviewMe take 50% of the $400 review price? Then I really don&#039;t understand why John Chow isn&#039;t selling reviews directly from his blog. More control and money should be reason enough.

As for the couple of negative reviews he has done, I don&#039;t think he should have agreed to the second one. The first one was blatant copyright infringement, and to take the $400 for a negative review was only right. The second time, however, I don&#039;t think the review was beneficial to anyone.

Of course it is difficult to disagree with an easy $400, but the review may cause him to actually lose potential review offers in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$200? Does ReviewMe take 50% of the $400 review price? Then I really don&#8217;t understand why John Chow isn&#8217;t selling reviews directly from his blog. More control and money should be reason enough.</p>
<p>As for the couple of negative reviews he has done, I don&#8217;t think he should have agreed to the second one. The first one was blatant copyright infringement, and to take the $400 for a negative review was only right. The second time, however, I don&#8217;t think the review was beneficial to anyone.</p>
<p>Of course it is difficult to disagree with an easy $400, but the review may cause him to actually lose potential review offers in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>The payment only goes through once you choose to accept the offer. He chose to review Andrew Talk&#039;s site and I think most people would if they were getting $200 out of the deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The payment only goes through once you choose to accept the offer. He chose to review Andrew Talk&#8217;s site and I think most people would if they were getting $200 out of the deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that the reviews were pre-paid. Otherwise he wouldn&#039;t have reviewed Andrew Talk&#039;s cluster f-ck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that the reviews were pre-paid. Otherwise he wouldn&#8217;t have reviewed Andrew Talk&#8217;s cluster f-ck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>How would stopping using ReviewMe give John more control over who he reviews? He always has the choice whether to review them or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would stopping using ReviewMe give John more control over who he reviews? He always has the choice whether to review them or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofangel.com/dont-buy-a-john-chow-review-without-the-blog-to-back-it-up/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Good luck.

I&#039;d like to build up to that as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to build up to that as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

