<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The great guest-blogging debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldofangel.com/the-great-guest-blogging-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldofangel.com/the-great-guest-blogging-debate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:04:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://worldofangel.com/the-great-guest-blogging-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofangel.com/the-great-guest-blogging-debate/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>But what you&#039;re saying is that the content is still second rate. Perhaps it&#039;s not substandard garbage, but it&#039;s generally not great content. Interesting discussion though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what you&#8217;re saying is that the content is still second rate. Perhaps it&#8217;s not substandard garbage, but it&#8217;s generally not great content. Interesting discussion though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://worldofangel.com/the-great-guest-blogging-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofangel.com/the-great-guest-blogging-debate/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>I have a question. Do you have any of that &quot;substandard garbage&quot; on your site? Or do you consider every bit of what you post on your site to be &quot;top content?&quot; And isn&#039;t there a happy medium? Just because it&#039;s not &quot;top content&quot; doesn&#039;t mean that it&#039;s automatically &quot;substandard garbage!&quot; After all, whom do you know that allows their readers to rate their content only between a one and a two? There&#039;s usually a few more digits involved than that! You can still keep the absolute #1 content for your site while writing guest articles on other sites that are a two or three as opposed to a flat out ten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question. Do you have any of that &#8220;substandard garbage&#8221; on your site? Or do you consider every bit of what you post on your site to be &#8220;top content?&#8221; And isn&#8217;t there a happy medium? Just because it&#8217;s not &#8220;top content&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean that it&#8217;s automatically &#8220;substandard garbage!&#8221; After all, whom do you know that allows their readers to rate their content only between a one and a two? There&#8217;s usually a few more digits involved than that! You can still keep the absolute #1 content for your site while writing guest articles on other sites that are a two or three as opposed to a flat out ten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

